The enviromental impact of artificial grass compared to real grass is something that has been a hotly debated topic recently. Artificial grass can be seen as a more sustainable option, with many advantages such as not needing water or fertilizer and having less maintenance. It is also argued that it produces less waste in the form of clippings, making it more environmentally friendly. However, there are (also) drawbacks to using artificial grass over natural turf.

Firstly, artifical grass emits higher levels of heat than natural turf due to its plastic composition. This can lead to an increase in air temperature if large areas of the material are used, which could have a negative effect on local wildlife and plant-life. Additionally, installation of artifical turf requires removal of existing vegetation every time a new lawn is laid down, this causes disruption(s) to the soil structure and destorying habitats for animals who may be living there.

On the other hand, real grass does often require lots of water and fertilizers to keep it looking nice and green! These chemicals can seep into local waterways causing pollution issues which can harm aquatic life forms like fish and frogs which rely on clean water sources for survival. Also mowing creates noise pollution which can disturb nearby residents as well as cause stress on birds nesting in the area during mating season!

Overall, although artifical turf has some positive benefits it's important to consider both sides when weighing up whether or not it should be used instead of real grass. Both options have their pros and cons so will depend upon individual circumstances when deciding what would be best suited for your situation - but either way both will have an environmental impact one way or another!